M10 — Expand Worksheet

Six pages. The point: replace the founder’s gut feeling about “where to expand next” with a scored shortlist, a binary test, and a cash bridge that survives the test failing. A worksheet that won’t let you confuse “we sold one in Germany” with “the model works in Germany”.

Page 1 — Second-market shortlist + the choice

Run after prompt 1. Three candidates scored, one chosen, the choice written down.

Current market 1 — geography + channel: ______

Three candidate second markets (geography OR channel, not both):

Candidate Type (new geo / new channel) Reachability (1-5) Translatability (1-5) Cost to enter (1-5) Signal quality (1-5) Cash recovery (1-5) Total (/25)
1
2
3
  • Highest total: ______
  • Chosen candidate: ______
  • Tie-breaker used (higher signal quality wins if within 2 points): Y/N ______
  • Written justification for the choice (3 sentences): ______

Page 2 — Market 1 baseline + variable discipline

Run after prompts 2 and 4. The spec sheet and the discipline rules.

Market 1 baseline — the rates market 2 has to substantially match:

Stage Market 1 rate Sample size Confidence (reliable / suggestive / anecdotal) Match threshold for market 2
Contact → reply within 30%
Reply → call within 30%
Call → close within 30%
CAC at or below 1.5x
Revenue per customer within 30%
Time from contact to close within 50%

Variable discipline — what’s changing vs what’s held constant:

Changed in market 2 (target: 1, max: 2) Why this variable is the one tested
Held constant from market 1 (everything else) Discipline rule that protects it under pressure
Offer
Price
Positioning / core message
Funnel structure
Founder time per contact
Qualifying criteria
Follow-up cadence

Page 3 — Replication test plan (signed before launch)

Run after prompt 3. One page. Signed. Dated.

The test:

  • Offer (unchanged from M5-M7): ______
  • Market 2 (geography + channel — fully specified): ______
  • Funnel mechanic (same as market 1): ______
  • Test window: 90 days, starting ______, ending ______
  • Sample target: ______ qualified contacts (minimum 50 directional, 200 confident)
  • Binary pass criteria: rates within threshold on at least 4 of 6 stages AND CAC at or below 1.5x market 1
  • Binary fail criteria: less than 4 of 6 stages within threshold OR CAC above 1.5x market 1

Signed (founder): ______    Date: ______

Goalposts moved between launch and month 3? Y/N: ______ (if Y, the test is invalidated — close and learn)

Page 4 — Expansion cost stack + cash bridge

Run after prompts 5 and 6. The numbers that decide whether the test launches at all.

90-day expansion cost stack:

Category Weekly run-rate 90-day total Assumption
Acquisition cost
Market research + entry
Channel setup
Operational overhead
Inventory / capacity
Contingency (25% of above)
TOTAL
  • Available cash buffer (from M9): ______
  • Total cost as % of buffer: ______% (if over 60%, reduce sample target or shorten test window — do not launch over 60%)

12-month cash bridge — three scenarios:

Month Scenario (a) test passes month 3 Scenario (b) test fails month 3 Scenario (c) mixed signal, extend 30 days
1
3
6
12
  • Does scenario (b) break another commitment (payroll, supplier, tax, debt)? Y/N: ______ (if Y, the test is too big — do not launch)

Page 5 — Opportunity cost + M11 prerequisite check

Run after prompt 7. The silent killer of expansion tests.

Market 1 workstreams during the test:

Workstream Hours/week diverted Risk to market 1 (L/M/H) Mitigation What intentionally slips
Content engine
Acquisition channel
Customer delivery
Founder operations
Other: ______

M11 prerequisite check (from M9 worksheet page 6):

  • % of market 1 tasks currently founder-only: ______%
  • If above 50%: go back to M11 prerequisites — the founder is not ready to dilute attention across two markets yet. Test is held until below 50%.

Page 6 — Kill / scale / hold rules + go/no-go into M11

Run after prompts 8, 9, 10. Written before launch. Followed at month 3.

Kill rule (3-5 conditions — any one tripping closes the test within 7 days):

# Condition Metric Threshold Time window Action
1 close test, post-mortem, return budget
2
3
4
5

Scale rule (4-6 conditions — all must be true to deploy into markets 3+):

# Condition Metric Threshold
1
2
3
4
5
6

Hold rule (conditions for a 30-60 day extension — all must be true):

  • Sample size below directional threshold (less than 50 qualified contacts): Y/N ______
  • No kill conditions tripped: Y/N ______
  • Cash buffer absorbs the extension without breaking scenario (b): Y/N ______

Diagnosis template — filled at month 3 if outcome is mixed:

  • Stages that held: ______
  • Stages that collapsed: ______
  • Collapses likely tactical (fixable in market 2): ______
  • Collapses likely structural (model doesn’t travel): ______
  • What I’d have to believe to extend: ______
  • What I’d have to believe to close: ______

Month 3 go/no-go into M11:

  • Test outcome: pass / fail / mixed (circle one)
  • If pass: scale rule conditions met? Y/N ______ → deploy to market 3 per plan
  • If fail: budget returned to buffer? Y/N ______ → M11 reframes as “what is this business actually” rather than “how do we lift the founder off”
  • If mixed: hold conditions met and 30-60 day extension launched? Y/N ______

M10 closed — signed and dated: ______    Date: ______